Carbon trading is an
approach used to control carbon dioxide pollution by providing economic
incentives for achieving emissions reductions. The use of market mechanisms, in
the form of carbon trading, has emerged as a key narrative in the international
response to climate change formalized in the United Nations Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. Carbon trading was first
proposed to the Second Conference of the Parties (COP) of the UNFCCC in 1996 and was later enshrined in the CDM of the Kyoto protocol of 1997.
There are two main forms
that carbon trading takes: ‘cap and trade’ and offsetting. Under cap and trade
schemes, governments or intergovernmental bodies set an overall legal limit on
emissions in a certain time period (‘a cap’) and then grant industries a
certain number of licenses to pollute (‘carbon permits’ or ‘emissions
allowances’). Companies that do not meet their cap can buy permits from others.
Carbon offsets are based
on ‘emissions-saving projects’ that are created to ‘compensate’ for continued
pollution in industrialized countries in the North. Offsets’ under the Kyoto A protocol is referred to as emissions reductions not covered by the cap in an
ETS. Pollution continues at one location and equivalent emissions saving or
increasing the capacity such as sink (such as forests or soils) will happen
elsewhere beyond ‘business as usual’. Offsets are also now widely traded
outside the Kyoto-compliance market, including by individuals and firms voluntarily
aiming to offset their GHG emissions.
Under Kyoto offset
projects fall under either the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) or Joint
Implementation (JI) and create credits called certified emission reduction
(CER) and emission reduction unit (ERU) respectively. Currently CDM projects
are the major source of Kyoto offsets and occur in industrially developing
countries falling outside any Kyoto emissions limits.
JI refers to projects
based in industrialized countries, typically Eastern Europe. Kyoto offsets
support industrialized countries with greater flexibility in meeting their
caps whilst achieving sustainable development and are also referred to as
‘flexibility mechanisms’. These offsets do not require a polluting source to
reduce its emissions, but instead, allow them to increase emissions and offset
them elsewhere. They could just as sensibly be called certified ‘emission
increase’ units.
Growing trees are
important components for carbon trading which happens under the Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) established under the Kyoto Protocol United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Carbon trading allows
developed countries to offset some of their carbon emissions by investing in
climate-friendly projects, such as tree planting under forestry CDM projects,
in developing countries.
While net global
emissions reductions should occur for source offset, where sink offsets are
involved the total scale of systemic GHG cycling will be expanded (e.g. via
more sources justified by more sinks). Such a process seriously risks further
enhancing the Greenhouse Effect.
Offsets also have several
problems as following. The amount of carbon emitted by the source is not always
equivalent to the amount of carbon offset by the sinks. The amount of carbon sequestration
in trees and soils varies greatly depending on the local environmental
conditions, skills of foresters, management practices and enforcement of regulations.
Forestry can also be subjected to disturbance and soil erosion resulting
release of the stored carbon.
Post a Comment